Dear Shadow Tribe,
Last post I looked at the three main arguments for the Tartaria conspiracy. This post looks at the counter-arguments against it.
The mainstream response is straightforward. Each of the three main evidences for the Lost Kingdom of Tartaria has a documented, ordinary explanation that does not require a lost empire or a hidden reset.
A label for the unknown, not an empire
European cartographers used Tartaria as a broad regional label for large parts of Asia they knew poorly. It was never intended as the name of one government or civilization. Most maps subdivided it into Great Tartary, Chinese Tartary, Independent Tartary, and others, reflecting different areas under different rulers.
The mainstream response is straightforward. Each of the three main evidences for the Lost Kingdom of Tartaria has a documented, ordinary explanation that does not require a lost empire or a hidden reset.
A label for the unknown, not an empire
European cartographers used Tartaria as a broad regional label for large parts of Asia they knew poorly. It was never intended as the name of one government or civilization. Most maps subdivided it into Great Tartary, Chinese Tartary, Independent Tartary, and others, reflecting different areas under different rulers.
As exploration improved in the 18th and 19th centuries, the old blanket term for "unknown" was replaced by more accurate names such as Siberia and Central Asia. Contemporary sources, including encyclopedias and travel accounts from the same period, describe the region as inhabited by various nomadic and settled peoples, not a single advanced empire. The actual history of those lands, such as the the Mongol Empire and its successor states, is recorded in multiple languages and archaeological records. The old maps record European ignorance of the areas, not the existence of a unified Tartarian civilization.
Buried lower levels show ordinary city growth
Windows and doors below modern street level appear in many older cities for practical reasons. Streets were raised to install sewers, improve drainage, or reduce flooding. Buildings were sometimes lifted or new ground levels added as cities expanded. Chicago and Seattle both have well-documented projects that raised street grades in the late 19th century.
Buried lower levels show ordinary city growth
Windows and doors below modern street level appear in many older cities for practical reasons. Streets were raised to install sewers, improve drainage, or reduce flooding. Buildings were sometimes lifted or new ground levels added as cities expanded. Chicago and Seattle both have well-documented projects that raised street grades in the late 19th century.
Similar work occurred in European cities around the same time. Contemporary city records, engineering reports, newspaper articles, and photographs show these changes happening over years through ordinary construction, not a sudden global mud flood. The pattern matches known city development, not a worldwide catastrophe that somehow left no other traces.
The ornate buildings actually fit
World’s Fair structures such as those at the 1893 Chicago exposition were temporary. They were designed by known architects, built quickly with plaster over wood frames, and demolished afterward. Construction photos, contracts, and contemporary descriptions exist. Similar ornate styles appear worldwide because classical and Beaux-Arts forms were taught and copied throughout the 19th century.
The ornate buildings actually fit
World’s Fair structures such as those at the 1893 Chicago exposition were temporary. They were designed by known architects, built quickly with plaster over wood frames, and demolished afterward. Construction photos, contracts, and contemporary descriptions exist. Similar ornate styles appear worldwide because classical and Beaux-Arts forms were taught and copied throughout the 19th century.
No physical or written evidence supports free-energy systems or other technology beyond what was available at the time. The speed of construction is explained by large workforces, prefabrication, and the temporary nature of the buildings. Reassigning them to a lost empire requires ignoring the paper trail that already accounts for them.
Conclusions
Taken together, the three main claims rest on reading ordinary historical and engineering records as anomalies, or ignoring them altogether. Those records show regional map labels, city-by-city street raising, and well-documented construction projects. No contemporary accounts, archaeological layers, or physical evidences support a recent global mud flood capable of erasing an advanced civilization across multiple continents at the same time.
Despite my usual skepticism toward official narratives, this is one alternative I have to reject. A mud flood recent enough to bury 19th-century buildings and global enough to affect cities on several continents should have left unmistakable traces in newspapers, government records, and diaries, as well as considerable physical evidence that would be impossible to hide so quickly. The complete absence of those traces, while ordinary explanations match the maps and buildings, makes the claim impossible for me to accept.
Conclusions
Taken together, the three main claims rest on reading ordinary historical and engineering records as anomalies, or ignoring them altogether. Those records show regional map labels, city-by-city street raising, and well-documented construction projects. No contemporary accounts, archaeological layers, or physical evidences support a recent global mud flood capable of erasing an advanced civilization across multiple continents at the same time.
Despite my usual skepticism toward official narratives, this is one alternative I have to reject. A mud flood recent enough to bury 19th-century buildings and global enough to affect cities on several continents should have left unmistakable traces in newspapers, government records, and diaries, as well as considerable physical evidence that would be impossible to hide so quickly. The complete absence of those traces, while ordinary explanations match the maps and buildings, makes the claim impossible for me to accept.
Between Shadows and Light,
Cade Shadowlight ☠
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are posted without moderation. Use caution when following links. Please keep discussions civil and on-topic.