Dear Shadow Tribe,
Supporters of the hidden-history version of Tartaria (post link) point to three main lines of evidence that they say do not fit the standard narrative.
1) Old maps label Tartaria
Maps drawn by European cartographers from the 1500s into the early 1800s repeatedly show sizable areas marked Tartaria, Great Tartary, Independent Tartary, Chinese Tartary, and similar names. These are not mistakes. Well-known mapmakers such as Guillaume de L’Isle around 1700 divided Asia into substantial Tartarian zones covering what is now Siberia, Central Asia, and lands farther east. The labels largely vanish from ordinary maps as the 19th century continues, replaced by Russian, Chinese, or other modern names. From this perspective, a consistently named region on primary source maps, followed by its near-total disappearance, looks like a real political or cultural entity that was later written out rather than simple geographic ignorance.
2) Buildings with buried lower levels
In cities across Europe, North America, and elsewhere, many older buildings show ground-floor windows, doors, and archways that sit partially or fully below the current street level. Examples appear in Chicago, Seattle, Paris, and smaller towns. These are not isolated basements. The pattern is systematic in places, as if the original street level was several feet lower. Old photographs of some cities also show streets that look recently cleared or unusually empty next to large, ornate buildings. The explanation offered is a large-scale mud or sediment event (or series of events) that buried lower stories. Streets were later rebuilt higher, while the buildings themselves remained. The history of how the ground rose is said to be missing from standard accounts.
3) Ornate buildings too advanced for their time period
Many grand structures, such as domed capitols, star forts, elaborate civic buildings, and the temporary palaces of the 1893 Chicago World’s Fair or the 1915 San Francisco Panama-Pacific Exposition, are claimed as Tartarian. Construction records for some of these, especially the fair buildings, show them going up extremely quickly with limited documented heavy machinery relative to their scale and detail. After the fairs, most were demolished, yet contemporary photos and accounts describe them as finished, substantial structures rather than flimsy temporary sets. Similar classical or ornate styles appear on multiple continents without a clear chain of continuous transmission that matches the official timelines. Combined with claims of free or wireless energy systems suggested by the prevalence of domes, spires, and certain metal elements, the pattern is read as the remnants of a more advanced civilization whose structures were later re-dated and reassigned.
These three evidences (maps, buried architecture, and surviving ornate structures) form the core case for the hidden history version of Tartaria. My next post will give the counter-arguments against this version.
1) Old maps label Tartaria
Maps drawn by European cartographers from the 1500s into the early 1800s repeatedly show sizable areas marked Tartaria, Great Tartary, Independent Tartary, Chinese Tartary, and similar names. These are not mistakes. Well-known mapmakers such as Guillaume de L’Isle around 1700 divided Asia into substantial Tartarian zones covering what is now Siberia, Central Asia, and lands farther east. The labels largely vanish from ordinary maps as the 19th century continues, replaced by Russian, Chinese, or other modern names. From this perspective, a consistently named region on primary source maps, followed by its near-total disappearance, looks like a real political or cultural entity that was later written out rather than simple geographic ignorance.
2) Buildings with buried lower levels
3) Ornate buildings too advanced for their time period
Many grand structures, such as domed capitols, star forts, elaborate civic buildings, and the temporary palaces of the 1893 Chicago World’s Fair or the 1915 San Francisco Panama-Pacific Exposition, are claimed as Tartarian. Construction records for some of these, especially the fair buildings, show them going up extremely quickly with limited documented heavy machinery relative to their scale and detail. After the fairs, most were demolished, yet contemporary photos and accounts describe them as finished, substantial structures rather than flimsy temporary sets. Similar classical or ornate styles appear on multiple continents without a clear chain of continuous transmission that matches the official timelines. Combined with claims of free or wireless energy systems suggested by the prevalence of domes, spires, and certain metal elements, the pattern is read as the remnants of a more advanced civilization whose structures were later re-dated and reassigned.
These three evidences (maps, buried architecture, and surviving ornate structures) form the core case for the hidden history version of Tartaria. My next post will give the counter-arguments against this version.
Suggested Readings
- Michael Luciano, The Lost Civilization of TARTARIA. Presents the case for a lost advanced empire, mud floods, free energy, and a historical reset.
- James W. Lee, The One World Tartarians: The Greatest Civilization Ever Erased From History. One of the earlier book-length treatments of the global Tartaria claim.
- Simon Horowitz, The Great Tartaria: Myth, History, and the Lost Empire. Covers the historical name alongside the modern alternative narrative.
Between Shadows and Light,
Cade Shadowlight ☠
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are posted without moderation. Use caution when following links. Please keep discussions civil and on-topic.